log in | register | forums
Show:
Go:
Forums
Username:

Password:

User accounts
Register new account
Forgot password
Forum stats
List of members
Search the forums

Advanced search
Recent discussions
- Elsear brings super-fast Networking to Risc PC/A7000/A7000+ (News:)
- Latest hardware upgrade from RISCOSbits (News:)
- Accessing old floppy disks (Gen:2)
- November developer 'fireside' chat on saturday night (News:)
- RISCOSbits releases a new laptop solution (News:4)
- Announcing the TIB 2024 Advent Calendar (News:2)
- RISC OS London Show Report 2024 (News:1)
- Code GCC produces that makes you cry #12684 (Prog:39)
- Rougol November 2024 meeting on monday (News:)
- Drag'n'Drop 14i1 edition reviewed (News:)
Latest postings RSS Feeds
RSS 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.9
Atom 0.3
Misc RDF | CDF
 
View on Mastodon
@www.iconbar.com@rss-parrot.net
Site Search
 
Article archives
The Icon Bar: The Playpen: NTS fodder
 
  NTS fodder
  This is a long thread. Click here to view the threaded list.
 
Jeffrey Lee Message #97320, posted by Phlamethrower at 23:56, 17/1/2007, in reply to message #97319
PhlamethrowerHot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot stuff

Posts: 15100
(Actually I should also add that the set is labelled "M15+ Recommended for mature audiences 15 years and over" - which may also indicate that these aren't the equivalent of the Beeb's chopped episodes.)
Amazon seem to think the ultimate boxset is rated 18 - must be some really good bits that were censored :o (Although, they also seem to think it only contains 2 discs. Play seems to be better, details-wise)

[Edited by Phlamethrower at 23:58, 17/1/2007]
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
VinceH Message #97327, posted by VincceH at 09:43, 18/1/2007, in reply to message #97320
VincceH
Lowering the tone since the dawn of time

Posts: 1600
(Actually I should also add that the set is labelled "M15+ Recommended for mature audiences 15 years and over" - which may also indicate that these aren't the equivalent of the Beeb's chopped episodes.)
In fact, I think that's "M" rating, with the 15+ not being part of the rating, but part of the explanation.

Amazon seem to think the ultimate boxset is rated 18 - must be some really good bits that were censored :o (Although, they also seem to think it only contains 2 discs. Play seems to be better, details-wise)
Looking at http://www.oflc.gov.au/special.html?n=276&p=134 you can see what the Australian classifications are. Roughly speaking:

'M' is the direct equivalent of our 15

'MA15+' falls somewhere between our 15 and 18; people aged 15 to 17 can watch if accompanied by a parent or guardian.

'R18+' is our 18.

However, while the comparison works reasonably well in that sense, what is permitted under each rating will vary - different land, different rules. You could always search the afforementioned site and compare with the BBFC to find the difference. :)

I've no real reason to suggest it - but I do believe that the Aussies let more through at the lower ratings than we do (witness: Matrix iirc), so based on what we've said so far, I am inclined to think the DVDs are uncut, but I can't say for sure.

I did consider searching the databases under both and comparing the running times (Australia uses PAL so for the same content, the result should be the same) - but for the Farscape discs oflc.gov.au gives 'varying' as the running time.
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
Jeffrey Lee Message #97929, posted by Phlamethrower at 09:08, 1/2/2007, in reply to message #97304
PhlamethrowerHot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot stuff

Posts: 15100
Oooh, hang on a minute! Allegedly 26th feb. Yay!
Only 25 days to go!!11!!1!111!3.14159!
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
Jeffrey Lee Message #97973, posted by Phlamethrower at 23:06, 1/2/2007, in reply to message #97262
PhlamethrowerHot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot stuff

Posts: 15100
Anything but the Torchwood roundup, because I'm doing that at some point :P
Well? :P

I managed to finally write something, so I'm sure you can. Although this one did pretty much write itself once I'd thought of the title :)
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
John Hoare Message #97983, posted by moss at 10:58, 2/2/2007, in reply to message #97973

Posts: 9348
See Mongrel's post :)

Although I will do a roundup at some point, when I get the chance - possibly getting everyone involved to write a section :P
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
Jeffrey Lee Message #97985, posted by Phlamethrower at 11:05, 2/2/2007, in reply to message #97983
PhlamethrowerHot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot stuff

Posts: 15100
See Mongrel's post :)
Which one? :o (Not this one, I assume)

Although I will do a roundup at some point, when I get the chance
:frown:

possibly getting everyone involved to write a section :P
:E

[Edited by Phlamethrower at 11:09, 2/2/2007]
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
Jeffrey Lee Message #99144, posted by Phlamethrower at 18:03, 25/2/2007, in reply to message #97929
PhlamethrowerHot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot stuff

Posts: 15100
Oooh, hang on a minute! Allegedly 26th feb. Yay!
Only 25 days to go!!11!!1!111!3.14159!
Only 2ish days to go!!!!11231312312£!"£!

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ordered Title Price Dispatched Subtotal
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Amazon.co.uk items (Sold by Amazon EU S.a.r.L.):

1 Ghost In The Shell - Stand... £29.99 1 £29.99

Shipped via Royal Mail (estimated arrival date: 27-February-2007).
*wonders if there's enough time to squeeze in a rewatch of the first season*
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
Jeffrey Lee Message #99157, posted by Phlamethrower at 00:30, 26/2/2007, in reply to message #99144
PhlamethrowerHot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot stuff

Posts: 15100
*wonders if there's enough time to squeeze in a rewatch of the first season*
I forgot how good this was!

*obligatory reminder to remind people that if they haven't watched Ghost In The Shell they are missing out on something very good indeed*

And, just like some magical power, inspiration has now struck for my next NTS article. Which will either be a magnificent and flawless explanation of why GITS is fantastic, Torchwood is shit (possibly, if I decide to mention it), and Primeval may or may not be shit (depending on if I can make my mind up in time). Or, the article may just be a load of old bollocks. But it will at least make up for the fact that I can't be arsed doing proper Primeval articles at the moment, Like Wot I Said I Would Be Doing.
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
Richard Goodwin Message #99163, posted by rich at 14:38, 26/2/2007, in reply to message #99157
Rich
Dictator for life
Posts: 6828
Primeval may or may not be shit (depending on if I can make my mind up in time)
[...]
I can't be arsed doing proper Primeval articles at the moment, Like Wot I Said I Would Be Doing.
I think your mind is already made up, you just can't admit it.
________
RichGCheers,
Rich.
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
Jeffrey Lee Message #99164, posted by Phlamethrower at 14:55, 26/2/2007, in reply to message #99163
PhlamethrowerHot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot stuff

Posts: 15100
Only 2ish days to go!!!!11231312312£!"£!
It's here!

Primeval may or may not be shit (depending on if I can make my mind up in time)
[...]
I can't be arsed doing proper Primeval articles at the moment, Like Wot I Said I Would Be Doing.
I think your mind is already made up, you just can't admit it.
Well, I don't. So far it has been shit, but then the crazy wifey thing appeared, and suddenly I'n not so sure anymore. This presents them with the opportunity to do something interesting, it's just a question of whether they follow through with it.

Which they probably won't.

But in order to actually find out, I'll have to watch the next episode.

And of course, all the other shit aspects of the show aren't likely to change if they do follow through - so there's very little chance of it becoming good simply because they're doing something interesting with crazy wifey.
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
Richard Goodwin Message #99170, posted by rich at 16:53, 26/2/2007, in reply to message #99164
Rich
Dictator for life
Posts: 6828
Primeval may or may not be shit (depending on if I can make my mind up in time)
[...]
I can't be arsed doing proper Primeval articles at the moment, Like Wot I Said I Would Be Doing.
I think your mind is already made up, you just can't admit it.
Well, I don't. So far it has been shit, but then the crazy wifey thing appeared, and suddenly I'n not so sure anymore. This presents them with the opportunity to do something interesting, it's just a question of whether they follow through with it.

Which they probably won't.

But in order to actually find out, I'll have to watch the next episode.

And of course, all the other shit aspects of the show aren't likely to change if they do follow through - so there's very little chance of it becoming good simply because they're doing something interesting with crazy wifey.
I refer the right honourable gentleman to my previous response.

Also, if they were going to do something interesting, they would have saved the "wifey" until the cliffhanger at the end of season 1. You'd have a few more episodes to build her up - does she really exist, or is it in his mind? Why, indeed, would his assistant choose to hallucinate wifey (didn't he say "She means as much to me as she does to you" or somesuch bollocks)? Is she helping their investigation, or hindering it? Is the main dude going to get it on with the sexy civil servant chick just before it turns out hs wife isn't really dead (e.g. they sleep together, he wakes up and sees his wife, freaks out, but is that just his guilt?)? Big reveal at the end of the first season, second season she can be an unwilling ally, third season you get to find out what's really going on (i.e. who's really creating the holes in time).

But no, they've shot their wad early. She'll probably die - either literally or figuratively, e.g. she'll fit right into their team and become just another set of boobs - and they won't make it past the first season anyway.

Best option: someone in charge notices it isn't getting stellar reviews, fires the writing staff, and starts hiring people that know what they're doing. But unlike the Beeb and Russell T, ITV don't exactly have a pool of half-decent sitcom writers to poach from.
________
RichGCheers,
Rich.
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
Jeffrey Lee Message #99171, posted by Phlamethrower at 17:04, 26/2/2007, in reply to message #99170
PhlamethrowerHot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot stuff

Posts: 15100
I refer the right honourable gentleman to my previous response.
Err, no. If, by some miracle, it turns out to be good, then I'm willing to accept that. Therefore, my mind is not made up.

Also, if they were going to do something interesting, they would have saved the "wifey" until the cliffhanger at the end of season 1.
By which time everyone would have stopped watching and not notice. And who says they can't do the interesting stuff now, while they still have a chance to regain some credibility? It isn't written in stone that you should always put big show-changing elements at the end of seasons.
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
Richard Goodwin Message #99172, posted by rich at 17:16, 26/2/2007, in reply to message #99171
Rich
Dictator for life
Posts: 6828
I refer the right honourable gentleman to my previous response.
Err, no. If, by some miracle, it turns out to be good, then I'm willing to accept that. Therefore, my mind is not made up.
If Jesus Christ himself shows up at my doorstep and performs a miracle, I'd change my opinions of him too, but until such time I think I already have enough information to make up my own mind.
Also, if they were going to do something interesting, they would have saved the "wifey" until the cliffhanger at the end of season 1.
By which time everyone would have stopped watching and not notice.
Not if they did something interesting, like providing the team with a credible nemesis: not some PS2-quality duck-billed dino (which is either a man-eater or not, depending on the pay scale of the actor in the water) but someone who's ahead of the curve and knows what they're going to do next before they do; someone who has not only been there and done that, but was also married to the guy in charge?
And who says they can't do the interesting stuff now, while they still have a chance to regain some credibility?
I know it's a rule of thumb that shit pilot equals good series, but shit pilot and shit episodes through the first half of the first season when you've got your only opportunity to grab viewers...? It's now half-way through the series. Come on. You know you're just kidding yourself.
It isn't written in stone that you should always put big show-changing elements at the end of seasons.
It pretty much is, you know. Have you watched much science fiction in the past?

Edit: http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/broadcasting/a42888/second-primeval-loses-bite.html
http://feelinglistless.blogspot.com/2007/02/primawful.html
________
RichGCheers,
Rich.
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
Jeffrey Lee Message #99174, posted by Phlamethrower at 17:38, 26/2/2007, in reply to message #99172
PhlamethrowerHot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot stuff

Posts: 15100
If Jesus Christ himself shows up at my doorstep and performs a miracle, I'd change my opinions of him too, but until such time I think I already have enough information to make up my own mind.
I've highlighted the important bit, there. Primeval has shown evidence that it could become good - should I simply ignore that when trying to come to a conclusion about it?

Not if they did something interesting, like providing the team with a credible nemesis: not some PS2-quality duck-billed dino (which is either a man-eater or not, depending on the pay scale of the actor in the water) but someone who's ahead of the curve and knows what they're going to do next before they do; someone who has not only been there and done that, but was also married to the guy in charge?
And how would they know about this nemesis, if they've given up watching? You're trying to convince me that I've come to the conclusion that Primeval is shit. If they hadn't had the meeting with the crazy wife, I would have agreed with you. And you're advocating that they save the crazy wife for the end of the series. Which means that I would have definitely reached the conclusion that it's shit, because nothing interesting would have happened in the first 3 episodes.

I know it's a rule of thumb that shit pilot equals good series, but shit pilot and shit episodes through the first half of the first season when you've got your only opportunity to grab viewers...?
So you admit yourself that she would be an interesting and worthwhile adversary, but then you scorn me for supporting the move to introduce her now?
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
Richard Goodwin Message #99175, posted by rich at 17:57, 26/2/2007, in reply to message #99174
Rich
Dictator for life
Posts: 6828
but until such time I think I already have enough information to make up my own mind.
I've highlighted the important bit, there. Primeval has shown evidence that it could become good - should I simply ignore that when trying to come to a conclusion about it?
What evidence? State your case, man!

And how would they know about this nemesis, if they've given up watching?
The whole point of having a credible nemesis is to make it not shit, so people would be watching it.

If you break storytelling down to its core element, it's all about the resolution of conflict. Bad shit happens, good guys overcome. You need to make the bad shit a credible threat - which I don't think the dinos are* - and you need to make the resolution thrilling and interesting - which just isn't happening.

* both due to the writing - it's currently a rather tired creature of the week format - and due to nature, because these are not smart animals.

Wifey gone for 8 years - oh look, now she's back in three hours! Hardly an intriguing plot thread that keeps you coming back for more. They could have made so much more of her.

You're trying to convince me that I've come to the conclusion that Primeval is shit.
...which actually started as a throwaway comment about the fact that you can't be arsed to write anything about it. If it was any good (for example, GitS:SAC good) you'd be moved to write something. As it is, you're spending more time arguing with me than writing the article. You, sir, find pissing away your time on a forum more interesting than the show itself. QED!
I have an excuse - I'm off work ill.

So you admit yourself that she would be an interesting and worthwhile adversary, but then you scorn me for supporting the move to introduce her now?
I said she *could* have been a worthwhile adversary, but the way they've handled it has been poor and they're ruined the chance. The storyline needed time to develop so that we gave a damn about the outcome. Three episodes in is way too soon.
________
RichGCheers,
Rich.
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
Jeffrey Lee Message #99176, posted by Phlamethrower at 18:11, 26/2/2007, in reply to message #99175
PhlamethrowerHot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot stuff

Posts: 15100
What evidence? State your case, man!
Where Main Bloke met with her, and found out that she's certifiably insane.

The whole point of having a credible nemesis is to make it not shit, so people would be watching it.
But if that nemesis only appears at the end of the series, then they'd have no reason to watch beyond the first couple of episodes in order to find out that the nemesis actually appears.

You need to make the bad shit a credible threat - which I don't think the dinos are - and you need to make the resolution thrilling and interesting - which just isn't happening.
A few dinos a week certainly isn't a credible threat. But they're also saying things that open them up to the possibility of introducing many more dinos, say a few thousand or million.

They could have made so much more of her.
Who's to say they're finished with her? She clearly isn't happy about being back, and having nosy government types poking their noses into "her" discovery which is hers and hers alone.

...which actually started as a throwaway comment


As it is, you're spending more time arguing with me than writing the article.
That's because I'm at work. Forum whoring is generally OK (particularly if you're able to work while browse the 'net - which I am). But I think watching TV and writing articles would be a step too far

I said she *could* have been a worthwhile adversary, but the way they've handled it has been poor and they're ruined the chance.
Erm, ever thought that she could escape?
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
Richard Goodwin Message #99178, posted by rich at 18:35, 26/2/2007, in reply to message #99176
Rich
Dictator for life
Posts: 6828
What evidence? State your case, man!
Where Main Bloke met with her, and found out that she's certifiably insane.
Insane, and therefore not responsible for her actions. Way to ruin any potential moral ambiguities. There's no "is she doing it for the greater good"? "Is she just following orders, haven't we heard that before, and who's giving these orders?" There's just "she's batshit whacko, ignore her".

The whole point of having a credible nemesis is to make it not shit, so people would be watching it.
But if that nemesis only appears at the end of the series, then they'd have no reason to watch beyond the first couple of episodes in order to find out that the nemesis actually appears.
You read the bits where I had her popping up in every episode, and where she could have been helping or hindering them, right? She'd be in it every episode, just with an ambiguity as to a) her existence and b) motivation (even if she is a hallucination, it goes to the doc's mental state if she's "hindering"). They've already blown both of those - she exists, and she's insane.

You need to make the bad shit a credible threat - which I don't think the dinos are - and you need to make the resolution thrilling and interesting - which just isn't happening.
A few dinos a week certainly isn't a credible threat. But they're also saying things that open them up to the possibility of introducing many more dinos, say a few thousand or million.
Which they'd only have the money to do once - at the end of the series, by which time no-one's watching? Sound familiar?

The formula - only three episodes in, mind - is already tired. They needed some external force to keep things rolling along, and they just got rid of one potentially interesting one. They could introduce a different one and keep it going for multiple series, but past evidence of shitness makes this highly unlikely. They've even made dinosaurs seem dull.

They could have made so much more of her.
Who's to say they're finished with her? She clearly isn't happy about being back, and having nosy government types poking their noses into "her" discovery which is hers and hers alone.
She's in custody. As you say, she could escape, but either she does so without giving any information away - which means her capture was absolutely pointless other than to ruin any chance of her existence being intriguing - or she gives away information that means there was no build-up. They won't be asking what she ate for breakfast, they'll be asking the big questions. "The portals are created by another branch of the government and I was in charge of trying to keep them contained. However, travelling through them too much makes you insane". Victories have to be fought for, you don't just introduce InfoDumpGirl. Does gateportal travel affect your health after a while? Guess one way or the other we won't be waiting several series for that one to pop up.

Either way (escape or stay) - I doubt they'll be able to improve matters by throwing away a useful set of potential hooks like that.

...which actually started as a throwaway comment
And you expected more because...?
As it is, you're spending more time arguing with me than writing the article.
That's because I'm at work. Forum whoring is generally OK (particularly if you're able to work while browse the 'net - which I am). But I think watching TV and writing articles would be a step too far
At 6:11pm? Go home!
I said she *could* have been a worthwhile adversary, but the way they've handled it has been poor and they're ruined the chance.
Erm, ever thought that she could escape?
Never crossed my mind

However, someone said:
"So far it has been shit [..] all the other shit aspects of the show aren't likely to change if they do follow through - so there's very little chance of it becoming good"
You see that quote? That's by you, that is. That's your words calling the program shit, and unlikely to change. And yet here you are, staying late at work, saying I'm wrong saying it's shit and unlikely to change.
________
RichGCheers,
Rich.
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
Jeffrey Lee Message #99179, posted by Phlamethrower at 18:47, 26/2/2007, in reply to message #99178
PhlamethrowerHot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot stuff

Posts: 15100
You read the bits where I had her popping up in every episode, and where she could have been helping or hindering them, right? She'd be in it every episode, just with an ambiguity as to a) her existence and b) motivation (even if she is a hallucination, it goes to the doc's mental state if she's "hindering").
But that's a tired idea that's been used far too many times to have an effect.

Which they'd only have the money to do once - at the end of the series, by which time no-one's watching? Sound familiar?
Well, it's not my fault they don't know how to spend their budget properly.

The formula - only three episodes in, mind - is already tired.
And for 2 and a half of those episodes, wifey was just this mysterious figure. And only went to contribute to the tired storyline. And you wanted them to do that through the rest of the series, too?

They've even made dinosaurs seem dull.
Probably because they can't decide on what age range the programme is aimed at.

existence being intriguing
To me, her phantom existence wasn't intriguing. But her real existence is - because I know it's not going to be a case of them stringing us along with lies and have one big reveal at the end where it all turns out to be fake, or some other letdown of a finale.

At 6:11pm? Go home!
Can't! Deadlines, and stuff.

However, someone said:
"So far it has been shit [..] all the other shit aspects of the show aren't likely to change if they do follow through - so there's very little chance of it becoming good"
You see that quote? That's by you, that is. That's your words calling the program shit, and unlikely to change. And yet here you are, staying late at work, saying I'm wrong saying it's shit and unlikely to change.
And you expected more because...?

At least I have the excuse that I'm only half-paying attention because I'm working
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
Jeffrey Lee Message #99374, posted by Phlamethrower at 21:53, 2/3/2007, in reply to message #99179
PhlamethrowerHot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot stuff

Posts: 15100
</2nd gig>

Now I have to wait about another year for the invevitable boxset of the inevitable 3rd gig

*remembers something*

Actually, the American (and thus presumably English) release of the SAC movie will be in July. Yay!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghost_in_the_Shell:_S.A.C._Solid_State_Society
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
Jeffrey Lee Message #99411, posted by Phlamethrower at 14:13, 3/3/2007, in reply to message #99374
PhlamethrowerHot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot stuff

Posts: 15100
It's there! It's there! It's there!

Although, I couldn't be bothered doing anything about Primeval/TW. So I guess I'll have to make my final verdict after todays episode.
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
Jeffrey Lee Message #100435, posted by Phlamethrower at 15:52, 21/3/2007, in reply to message #82472
PhlamethrowerHot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot stuff

Posts: 15100
Keep recommending stuff... because me and Tanya went into Music Zone the other day - and bought £80 of DVDs
Yay! Monies.

I think my current list of recommendations for you stand at (in no particular order):

1. Lexx. The first season would probably make the most sense to buy first, and should be readily available. Second season seems to be out of production, so you'll have to look on ebay/amazon marketplace. Third season boxset was still available last I checked - and fourth season never made it to DVD in the UK, so you'll have to wait for it to be repeated again on TV or import the American release.
2. Ghibli. I can't really name one which you'd like, because they're all very different from each other. Just don't be afraid to choose one which you think isn't made with you in mind. And remember to play it safe by watching it in Japanese with subtitles
3. GITS. As my overly-long article proved there are many differences between the different versions, so again it's a bit hard to recommend one. The first film if you're unsure - the manga if you'd like to read - the second film if you're interested in experiments in film-making rather than a deep storyline - the 1st season boxset if you're fairly certain you'll like it - and the second season volumes if you're feeling really rich
4. Some other stuff, I guess. The above three would give you a wide range of settings, styles and stories - I haven't yet found a fourth that I'd consider recommending to an outsider. But for what it's worth, the contenders so far (I.e. the only other movie-type stuff I've really watched recently, but stuff that just so happens to be good) are Battle Royale 1 & 2 (Apart from being good movies there's some interesting political/humanitarian motiviation behind them), and Akira (similar setting to GITS, but a somewhat more fantastical story).

Not entirely sure where my travels will take me next. Season 2 of GITS would be nice, but I'd rather buy the boxset than fork out on the individual volumes. Plus I need to hurry up and get my hands on the second half of Lexx season 2.

Oh, and you can also download MCoG if you're nostalgic about 80's children's TV

[Edited by Phlamethrower at 01:34, 6/11/2006]
*bumpage for moss's birthday*

Also, it's my birthday next week, so this is prime time for you to recommend something for me.
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
Jeffrey Lee Message #109280, posted by Phlamethrower at 02:22, 5/2/2009, in reply to message #97304
PhlamethrowerHot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot stuff

Posts: 15100
I'm currently trying to convince myself that I don't need to spend silly amounts of money on the Farscape Ultimate Complete Collection.
Still rather expensive at £93 (I think it was £150-ish when I first posted that two years ago), but I've just bought it. At the price it's at now I don't think it costs much more than if I were to scrounge around for individual volumes/seasons, plus it avoids a hell of a lot of hassle.
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
VinceH Message #109281, posted by VincceH at 09:12, 5/2/2009, in reply to message #109280
VincceH
Lowering the tone since the dawn of time

Posts: 1600
I think that's in the same ballpark I paid for all four seasons plus The Peacekeeper Wars from down under, including shipping etc. I consider Farscape a bargain at that price point.
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
Jeffrey Lee Message #109339, posted by Phlamethrower at 20:19, 16/2/2009, in reply to message #109281
PhlamethrowerHot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot stuff

Posts: 15100
It's here! It's also slightly smaller than I expected, since they haven't used ordinary DVD cases. Instead it's just a bunch of slightly flimsy cardboard folder things with disc holders glued onto the inside. Decreased space = good, increased chance of damage/breakage when removing a folder from the box = bad.

Also they haven't printed the rating on the spines of the folders, only on the individual discs, so I can't quickly check to see which episode(s) were rated 18 tongue
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
Jason Togneri Message #109347, posted by filecore at 07:44, 17/2/2009, in reply to message #109339

Posts: 3868
Also they haven't printed the rating on the spines of the folders, only on the individual discs, so I can't quickly check to see which episode(s) were rated 18 tongue
OH NOES shock
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
Jeffrey Lee Message #109449, posted by Phlamethrower at 01:03, 2/3/2009, in reply to message #109347
PhlamethrowerHot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot stuff

Posts: 15100
Also they haven't printed the rating on the spines of the folders, only on the individual discs, so I can't quickly check to see which episode(s) were rated 18 tongue
OH NOES shock
I found one! Hurrah!

Judging by the two episodes that were on the disc, I guess they took objection to the uncharacteristically graphic scene of someone's arm getting burnt off by acid in Home on the Remains.

Of course, I've now realised that I could just search the bbfc website to find the ones that are rated 18. And I've just done so, and it looks like that was the only episode.

Also I'm left wondering why all the discs only seem to contain 2 or 3 episodes each, since judging by the amount of space they use you can easily fit 4 onto a dual layer disc. Boo to wasted shelf space!
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
VinceH Message #109454, posted by VincceH at 09:51, 2/3/2009, in reply to message #109449
VincceH
Lowering the tone since the dawn of time

Posts: 1600
Also I'm left wondering why all the discs only seem to contain 2 or 3 episodes each, since judging by the amount of space they use you can easily fit 4 onto a dual layer disc.
I was going to suggest that the reason is probably down to it being the region 2 set - I suspect the set is actually a repackaged version of the original releases.

However, that those releases were two episodes per disc doesn't actually explain anything. It might have done if they were single disc releases (ie selling two episodes per unit) but in fact they were two disc sets (so four eps per unit). Did they ever sell them as single disc editions?

My region 4 DVDs are the usual (for a TV series) four episodes per disc.

[Edited by VincceH at 09:52, 2/3/2009]
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
Jeffrey Lee Message #109530, posted by Phlamethrower at 23:41, 11/3/2009, in reply to message #109454
PhlamethrowerHot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot stuff

Posts: 15100
Episode disc space update: The last couple of discs I've watched (the end of season 2) seemed to have a noticeably greater image quality. And I've just spotted that the last of the two discs has a size of 7.65GB, despite only containing two episodes. Which may or may not mean that earlier episodes were purposefully kept at a lower quality (and may or may not mean that future episodes remain at this quality level).

Or maybe I'm just imagining things and there's some other reason for this disc to be so big.
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
Pages (6): |< < 6

The Icon Bar: The Playpen: NTS fodder