log in | register | forums
Show:
Go:
Forums
Username:

Password:

User accounts
Register new account
Forgot password
Forum stats
List of members
Search the forums

Advanced search
Recent discussions
- Elsear brings super-fast Networking to Risc PC/A7000/A7000+ (News:)
- Latest hardware upgrade from RISCOSbits (News:)
- Accessing old floppy disks (Gen:3)
- November developer 'fireside' chat on saturday night (News:)
- RISCOSbits releases a new laptop solution (News:4)
- Announcing the TIB 2024 Advent Calendar (News:2)
- RISC OS London Show Report 2024 (News:1)
- Code GCC produces that makes you cry #12684 (Prog:39)
- Rougol November 2024 meeting on monday (News:)
- Drag'n'Drop 14i1 edition reviewed (News:)
Latest postings RSS Feeds
RSS 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.9
Atom 0.3
Misc RDF | CDF
 
View on Mastodon
@www.iconbar.com@rss-parrot.net
Site Search
 
Article archives
The Icon Bar: The Playpen: De facto vs De baaaaaaah
 
  De facto vs De baaaaaaah
  VincceH (11:37 20/10/2008)
  Loris (12:54 20/10/2008)
    VincceH (14:10 20/10/2008)
 
VinceH Message #108574, posted by VincceH at 11:37, 20/10/2008
VincceH
Lowering the tone since the dawn of time

Posts: 1600
Someone has asked me to confirm a meeting, by sending me an Outlook generated calendar file; no accompanying plain/body text, just the file itself.

I'm deliberately being an obstinate twat in response; I've said "Yes, I do have Outlook, but I don't actually run it - it's there purely to allow my phone to synch with the computer so that it's files and contacts are backed up" and that "I'm not willing to run this file, because I don't really know it's safe".

I can read the file - the format is essentially textual - but I didn't mention that.

He's come back with "Is that a yes or a no?"

So, my reply says "A yes to what?" and quoted the first few lines of the file, adding "If there's a question in there, the best way to ask it is to actually just ask, in plain English, rather than make assumptions about software being used and my willingness to run arbitrary files."

Outlook: It's not a de facto standard, it's a de baaaaaah standard.

There's no real point to this, I just thought I mentioned it.

(Incidentally, the company concerned is the one who I think effectively killed my laptop.)
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
Tony Haines Message #108575, posted by Loris at 12:54, 20/10/2008, in reply to message #108574
madbanHa ha, me mine, mwahahahaha
Posts: 1025
(Incidentally, the company concerned is the one who I think effectively killed my laptop.)
Well, in that case... did you see my suggestion on how to solve the question you asked in that thread?
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
VinceH Message #108576, posted by VincceH at 14:10, 20/10/2008, in reply to message #108575
VincceH
Lowering the tone since the dawn of time

Posts: 1600
Yeah... without checking and from memory I think you were effectively talking about a decent surge protector, weren't you?

In fact, that's a good idea for another reason - the wall outlet is awkward to get to for my desk; I have to pull out the printer desk, clamber behind and and stretch behind my desk to reach it; so a surge protector on an extension, sat atop the desk, would make it a lot less effort to plug in.

However, I've solved the problem another way: I've already told the guy there that under the circumstances I'm unwilling to plug my computer into their mains and that from this point on, I'll operate on batteries only; once the battery is so low I have to shut down, my day will be over.

But if they put a decent surge protector in, I'll happily use that. (In fact, I've told the guy he should do that anyway for the PC on his desk).

[Edited by VincceH at 11:09, 29/11/2008]
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 

The Icon Bar: The Playpen: De facto vs De baaaaaaah