| |
Web technologies forum |
| |
Hertzsprung (18:13 8/3/2003)
alpha (18:18 8/3/2003)
Kinetic (18:30 8/3/2003)
alpha (18:38 8/3/2003)
Kinetic (18:57 8/3/2003)
alpha (20:19 8/3/2003)
moss (11:12 9/3/2003)
Kinetic (11:23 9/3/2003)
moss (11:27 9/3/2003)
Kinetic (11:40 9/3/2003)
moss (11:54 9/3/2003)
Kinetic (12:44 9/3/2003)
Phlamethrower (22:07 9/3/2003)
andypoole (09:38 10/3/2003)
Phlamethrower (09:45 10/3/2003)
monkeyson2 (09:51 10/3/2003)
moss (19:03 10/3/2003)
Kinetic (21:15 10/3/2003)
moss (21:18 10/3/2003)
Phlamethrower (21:20 10/3/2003)
Kinetic (07:56 11/3/2003)
moss (08:56 11/3/2003)
Hertzsprung (19:17 8/3/2003)
Kinetic (19:20 8/3/2003)
Hertzsprung (19:23 8/3/2003)
Kinetic (19:40 8/3/2003)
takkaria (19:48 8/3/2003)
|
| |
|
James Shaw |
Message #36227, posted by Hertzsprung at 18:13, 8/3/2003 |
 Ghost-like
Posts: 1746
|
I know the subject has been brought up before, but can we have one, pretty please?  |
| |
 [ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Tim Fountain |
Message #36231, posted by alpha at 18:18, 8/3/2003, in reply to message #36227 |
Forum bod
Posts: 570
|
What's wrong with the Comms forum? |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Andrew Duffell |
Message #36233, posted by ad at 18:30, 8/3/2003, in reply to message #36231 |
Posts: 3262
|
What's wrong with the Comms forum? It kinda smells funny (  ).
I agree with  , A seperate one for things like hosting and PHP to be dicussed would be very good!
[Edited by Kinetic at 18:30, 8/3/2003] |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Tim Fountain |
Message #36235, posted by alpha at 18:38, 8/3/2003, in reply to message #36233 |
Forum bod
Posts: 570
|
I don't think there's any need for it. The comms forum is for discussion of all Internet and networking issues, and many of the threads in there relate to Web technologies. The forum is hardly overused, so there's no reason to split it up further. |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Andrew Duffell |
Message #36238, posted by ad at 18:57, 8/3/2003, in reply to message #36235 |
Posts: 3262
|
I don't think there's any need for it. The comms forum is for discussion of all Internet and networking issues, and many of the threads in there relate to Web technologies. The forum is hardly overused, so there's no reason to split it up further. IF there was a WT forum, I would use it. Currently I post on other sites for WT help. Comms tends to look like a forum to talk about web software. |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
James Shaw |
Message #36240, posted by Hertzsprung at 19:17, 8/3/2003, in reply to message #36235 |
Ghost-like
Posts: 1746
|
I don't think there's any need for it. The comms forum is for discussion of all Internet and networking issues, and many of the threads in there relate to Web technologies. The forum is hardly overused, so there's no reason to split it up further. Aw, purleeease! |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Andrew Duffell |
Message #36241, posted by ad at 19:20, 8/3/2003, in reply to message #36240 |
Posts: 3262
|
I don't think there's any need for it. The comms forum is for discussion of all Internet and networking issues, and many of the threads in there relate to Web technologies. The forum is hardly overused, so there's no reason to split it up further. Aw, purleeease!
Pretty please! |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
James Shaw |
Message #36242, posted by Hertzsprung at 19:23, 8/3/2003, in reply to message #36241 |
Ghost-like
Posts: 1746
|
I don't think there's any need for it. The comms forum is for discussion of all Internet and networking issues, and many of the threads in there relate to Web technologies. The forum is hardly overused, so there's no reason to split it up further. Aw, purleeease!
Pretty please!
with sugar on |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Andrew Duffell |
Message #36244, posted by ad at 19:40, 8/3/2003, in reply to message #36242 |
Posts: 3262
|
I don't think there's any need for it. The comms forum is for discussion of all Internet and networking issues, and many of the threads in there relate to Web technologies. The forum is hardly overused, so there's no reason to split it up further. Aw, purleeease!
Pretty please!
with sugar on
and a big red cherry on top |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Andrew Sidwell |
Message #36249, posted by takkaria at 19:48, 8/3/2003, in reply to message #36227 |
Member
Posts: 324
|
I know the subject has been brought up before, but can we have one, pretty please? I suggested this a while ago, but was pointed to the Comms forum.
Doh. |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Tim Fountain |
Message #36253, posted by alpha at 20:19, 8/3/2003, in reply to message #36238 |
Forum bod
Posts: 570
|
Comms tends to look like a forum to talk about web software. Well now you know otherwise . |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
John Hoare |
Message #36260, posted by moss at 11:12, 9/3/2003, in reply to message #36253 |
Posts: 9348
|
I agree with Tim.  |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Andrew Duffell |
Message #36262, posted by ad at 11:23, 9/3/2003, in reply to message #36260 |
Posts: 3262
|
I agree with Tim. Well you would. |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
John Hoare |
Message #36263, posted by moss at 11:27, 9/3/2003, in reply to message #36262 |
Posts: 9348
|
I agree with Tim. Well you would.
Seriously, I don't see what's wrong with using the Comms forum for it. It's not as if it's overused. |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Andrew Duffell |
Message #36275, posted by ad at 11:40, 9/3/2003, in reply to message #36263 |
Posts: 3262
|
I agree with Tim. Well you would.
Seriously, I don't see what's wrong with using the Comms forum for it. It's not as if it's overused.
It should be remamed then
|
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
John Hoare |
Message #36279, posted by moss at 11:54, 9/3/2003, in reply to message #36275 |
Posts: 9348
|
It should be remamed then
Actually, it could be. Not sure what to, though... |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Andrew Duffell |
Message #36282, posted by ad at 12:44, 9/3/2003, in reply to message #36279 |
Posts: 3262
|
It should be remamed then
Actually, it could be. Not sure what to, though...
Comms and Web Technologies ???? |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Jeffrey Lee |
Message #36338, posted by Phlamethrower at 22:07, 9/3/2003, in reply to message #36282 |
 Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot stuff
Posts: 15100
|
Comms and Web Technologies ???? Gets my vote |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Andrew Poole |
Message #36367, posted by andypoole at 09:38, 10/3/2003, in reply to message #36338 |
Posts: 5558
|
Comms and Web Technologies ???? Gets my vote
Surely Comms and Web would be a bit easier to read
________
|
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Jeffrey Lee |
Message #36368, posted by Phlamethrower at 09:45, 10/3/2003, in reply to message #36367 |
Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot stuff
Posts: 15100
|
Comms Stuff and Web Stuff? |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Phil Mellor |
Message #36370, posted by monkeyson2 at 09:51, 10/3/2003, in reply to message #36368 |
 Please don't let them make me be a monkey butler
Posts: 12380
|
But web stuff is part of comms. You might as well suggest that we have the "Programming and BASIC" forum. Cue jokes about BASIC not being real programming...
If it has to be renamed, I suggest "Pots and string".
Failing that, make more mention of the web technologies bit in the forum description, rather than its title. |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
John Hoare |
Message #36477, posted by moss at 19:03, 10/3/2003, in reply to message #36370 |
Posts: 9348
|
Failing that, make more mention of the web technologies bit in the forum description, rather than its title. Yes.  |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Andrew Duffell |
Message #36492, posted by ad at 21:15, 10/3/2003, in reply to message #36477 |
Posts: 3262
|
Failing that, make more mention of the web technologies bit in the forum description, rather than its title. Yes.
No |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
John Hoare |
Message #36493, posted by moss at 21:18, 10/3/2003, in reply to message #36492 |
Posts: 9348
|
|
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Jeffrey Lee |
Message #36494, posted by Phlamethrower at 21:20, 10/3/2003, in reply to message #36493 |
Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot stuff
Posts: 15100
|
/me slaps Kinetic. And Iyonix. and any other avatars he decides to name after computers |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Andrew Duffell |
Message #36510, posted by ad at 07:56, 11/3/2003, in reply to message #36494 |
Posts: 3262
|
/me slaps Kinetic. And Iyonix. and any other avatars he decides to name after computers bit ch
[Edited by Kinetic at 14:29, 11/3/2003] |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
John Hoare |
Message #36537, posted by moss at 08:56, 11/3/2003, in reply to message #36510 |
Posts: 9348
|
b***h |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
