| |
Job for a moderator |
| |
Kinetic (18:02 18/5/2003)
diodesign (18:06 18/5/2003)
Kinetic (18:10 18/5/2003)
moss (18:21 18/5/2003)
andypoole (18:10 18/5/2003)
alpha (18:36 18/5/2003)
Kinetic (18:41 18/5/2003)
andypoole (18:41 18/5/2003)
moss (18:44 18/5/2003)
monkeyson2 (08:24 19/5/2003)
andrew (10:05 19/5/2003)
takkaria (13:32 19/5/2003)
andrew (13:48 19/5/2003)
andypoole (14:15 19/5/2003)
andrew (14:27 19/5/2003)
moss (14:56 19/5/2003)
monkeyson2 (16:08 19/5/2003)
moss (16:58 19/5/2003)
andrew (16:28 19/5/2003)
moss (16:58 19/5/2003)
|
| |
|
Andrew Duffell |
Message #42300, posted by ad at 18:02, 18/5/2003 |
Posts: 3262
|
Can someone delete the thread entitled Brothel from the playpen, because it is coming up first if people search for my name on Google, which isn't really very good.
Thanks  |
| |
 [ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Chris Williams |
Message #42304, posted by diodesign at 18:06, 18/5/2003, in reply to message #42300 |
 The Opposition
Posts: 269
|
Can someone delete the thread entitled Brothel from the playpen, because it is coming up first if people search for my name on Google, which isn't really very good. Is it? Let me search for Andrew Duffell on google..
Well I can't see any mention and besides, you started the thread anyway. I boggle thee.
Chris. |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Andrew Poole |
Message #42312, posted by andypoole at 18:10, 18/5/2003, in reply to message #42300 |
Posts: 5558
|
Can someone delete the thread entitled Brothel from the playpen, because it is coming up first if people search for my name on Google, which isn't really very good.
Thanks See the reasons we haven't deleted it in the thread itself in the playpen. |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Andrew Duffell |
Message #42313, posted by ad at 18:10, 18/5/2003, in reply to message #42304 |
Posts: 3262
|
Can someone delete the thread entitled Brothel from the playpen, because it is coming up first if people search for my name on Google, which isn't really very good. Is it? Let me search for Andrew Duffell on google..
Well I can't see any mention and besides, you started the thread anyway. I boggle thee.
Chris.
Look harder... http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22andrew+duffell%22 |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
John Hoare |
Message #42327, posted by moss at 18:21, 18/5/2003, in reply to message #42313 |
Posts: 9348
|
Look harder... http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22andrew+duffell%22 It's gone now anyway  |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Tim Fountain |
Message #42331, posted by alpha at 18:36, 18/5/2003, in reply to message #42300 |
Forum bod
Posts: 570
|
If you don't want what you post to appear in the search engines, don't post it. Simple.
If whoever's writing you a reference somehow stumbled upon the thread, I'm sure the uncalled for insults from you that are there now would be a lot more damaging to you than whatever was there before. |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Andrew Duffell |
Message #42332, posted by ad at 18:41, 18/5/2003, in reply to message #42331 |
Posts: 3262
|
If you don't want what you post to appear in the search engines, don't post it. Simple.
I didn't post my name all over it. Some one else did
|
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Andrew Poole |
Message #42333, posted by andypoole at 18:41, 18/5/2003, in reply to message #42332 |
Posts: 5558
|
If you don't want what you post to appear in the search engines, don't post it. Simple.
I didn't post my name all over it. Some one else did
Its still not our fault |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
John Hoare |
Message #42334, posted by moss at 18:44, 18/5/2003, in reply to message #42332 |
Posts: 9348
|
I didn't post my name all over it. Some one else did
The thing is, that's not the issue. The issue is that *you* created the thread. Whether someone else actually *used* your name or not is irrelevant - you have to accept that if you start a thread like that, you have to suffer the concequences.
Like I said; hopefully this will learn you some manners. |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Phil Mellor |
Message #42348, posted by monkeyson2 at 08:24, 19/5/2003, in reply to message #42334 |
 Please don't let them make me be a monkey butler
Posts: 12380
|
I think if a page appears in Google which you aren't happy with, the correct course of action is to ask Google not to index it. You'd have to be the webmaster or have the law behind you of course.
I think the method you used was easier. |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Andrew |
Message #42367, posted by andrew at 10:05, 19/5/2003, in reply to message #42334 |
 Handbag Boi
Posts: 3439
|
I didn't post my name all over it. Some one else did
The thing is, that's not the issue. The issue is that *you* created the thread. Whether someone else actually *used* your name or not is irrelevant - you have to accept that if you start a thread like that, you have to suffer the concequences.
Like I said; hopefully this will learn you some manners.
And yet you don't seem to mind your name appearing beside highly explicit threads regularly!
[Edited by rich at 11:12, 19/5/2003. quoting broken] |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Andrew Sidwell |
Message #42428, posted by takkaria at 13:32, 19/5/2003, in reply to message #42367 |
Member
Posts: 324
|
And yet you don't seem to mind your name appearing beside highly explicit threads regularly! That's not relevant at all. |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Andrew |
Message #42433, posted by andrew at 13:48, 19/5/2003, in reply to message #42428 |
Handbag Boi
Posts: 3439
|
And yet you don't seem to mind your name appearing beside highly explicit threads regularly! That's not relevant at all.
Why not? |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Andrew Poole |
Message #42442, posted by andypoole at 14:15, 19/5/2003, in reply to message #42433 |
Posts: 5558
|
And yet you don't seem to mind your name appearing beside highly explicit threads regularly! That's not relevant at all.
Why not?
It just isn't |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Andrew |
Message #42443, posted by andrew at 14:27, 19/5/2003, in reply to message #42442 |
Handbag Boi
Posts: 3439
|
And yet you don't seem to mind your name appearing beside highly explicit threads regularly! That's not relevant at all.
Why not?
It just isn't
That's not very rational. |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
John Hoare |
Message #42447, posted by moss at 14:56, 19/5/2003, in reply to message #42443 |
Posts: 9348
|
And yet you don't seem to mind your name appearing beside highly explicit threads regularly! That's not relevant at all.
Why not?
It just isn't
That's not very rational.
If you read the post in the Playpen, I say that I can't see any problem with people's names being beside explicit threads anyway; if I recall, I say that "anyone who cares about that kind of thing isn't worth impressing".
Just exactly what *is* your point?
EDIT: If you're referring to the manners comment, I'm referring to the way Andrew dealt with the moderators, trying to order them about; not about the thread he started...
[Edited by moss at 15:57, 19/5/2003] |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Phil Mellor |
Message #42470, posted by monkeyson2 at 16:08, 19/5/2003, in reply to message #42447 |
Please don't let them make me be a monkey butler
Posts: 12380
|
I can't see any problem with people's names being beside explicit threads anyway; Yes well in your case there isn't any alternative  |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Andrew |
Message #42479, posted by andrew at 16:28, 19/5/2003, in reply to message #42447 |
Handbag Boi
Posts: 3439
|
And yet you don't seem to mind your name appearing beside highly explicit threads regularly! That's not relevant at all.
Why not?
It just isn't
That's not very rational.
If you read the post in the Playpen, I say that I can't see any problem with people's names being beside explicit threads anyway; if I recall, I say that "anyone who cares about that kind of thing isn't worth impressing".
Just exactly what *is* your point?
EDIT: If you're referring to the manners comment, I'm referring to the way Andrew dealt with the moderators, trying to order them about; not about the thread he started...
[Edited by
at 15:57, 19/5/2003]
I didn't see the other post but I thought with you saying manners you'd suddenly turned against risque threads! |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
John Hoare |
Message #42486, posted by moss at 16:58, 19/5/2003, in reply to message #42479 |
Posts: 9348
|
I didn't see the other post but I thought with you saying manners you'd suddenly turned against risque threads! Oh no, I love them 
Bum. |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
John Hoare |
Message #42487, posted by moss at 16:58, 19/5/2003, in reply to message #42470 |
Posts: 9348
|
I can't see any problem with people's names being beside explicit threads anyway; Yes well in your case there isn't any alternative
|
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
