| |
Text size with Safari user agent |
| |
ksattic (18:17 12/5/2006)
andypoole (18:42 12/5/2006)
monkeyson2 (00:28 13/5/2006)
rich (11:35 13/5/2006)
moss (13:10 31/5/2006)
monkeyson2 (14:00 31/5/2006)
Andrew Duffell (15:38 31/5/2006)
monkeyson2 (15:47 31/5/2006)
andypoole (16:04 31/5/2006)
rich (18:35 31/5/2006)
monkeyson2 (19:31 31/5/2006)
rich (20:57 31/5/2006)
andypoole (21:12 31/5/2006)
rich (22:36 31/5/2006)
moss (22:28 1/6/2006)
andypoole (09:09 2/6/2006)
richcheng (10:15 2/6/2006)
monkeyson2 (10:29 2/6/2006)
|
| |
|
Simon Wilson |
Message #75400, posted by ksattic at 18:17, 12/5/2006 |
 Finally, an avatar!
Posts: 1291
|
I noticed that the fonts on TIB look much bigger in Safari, so I changed the user-agent string in Firefox on Windows, and sure enough, the fonts get bigger. What's going on there then? |
| |
 [ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Andrew Poole |
Message #75401, posted by andypoole at 18:42, 12/5/2006, in reply to message #75400 |
Posts: 5558
|
I noticed that the fonts on TIB look much bigger in Safari, so I changed the user-agent string in Firefox on Windows, and sure enough, the fonts get bigger. What's going on there then? Hm, I hadn't noticed that  |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Phil Mellor |
Message #75409, posted by monkeyson2 at 00:28, 13/5/2006, in reply to message #75401 |
 Please don't let them make me be a monkey butler
Posts: 12380
|
I use Safari and I like the font size. So ner.  |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Richard Goodwin |
Message #75415, posted by rich at 11:35, 13/5/2006, in reply to message #75400 |
 Dictator for life
Posts: 6828
|
I noticed that the fonts on TIB look much bigger in Safari, so I changed the user-agent string in Firefox on Windows, and sure enough, the fonts get bigger. What's going on there then? Macs have traditionally done some strange things with regards to font size and/or DPI, which lead to the need for separate style sheets for Mac and non-Mac browsers. Now it would appear that they're moving more towards what everyone else does... but that means the previous kludges don't work properly.
We *could* just remove the check and have one stylesheet... any objections?
________
 Cheers,
Rich.
|
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
John Hoare |
Message #75895, posted by moss at 13:10, 31/5/2006, in reply to message #75415 |
Posts: 9348
|
We *could* just remove the check and have one stylesheet... any objections? I now use Safari... and I'd prefer having one stylesheet. I don't like the large font  |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Phil Mellor |
Message #75896, posted by monkeyson2 at 14:00, 31/5/2006, in reply to message #75895 |
Please don't let them make me be a monkey butler
Posts: 12380
|
We *could* just remove the check and have one stylesheet... any objections? I now use Safari... and I'd prefer having one stylesheet. I don't like the large font
Grrr!
Can we compromise and have one stylesheet that uses the big font?  |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Andrew Duffell |
Message #75897, posted by ad at 15:38, 31/5/2006, in reply to message #75896 |
Posts: 3262
|
We *could* just remove the check and have one stylesheet... any objections? I now use Safari... and I'd prefer having one stylesheet. I don't like the large font
Grrr!
Can we compromise and have one stylesheet that uses the big font?
Ctrl++ works well. |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Phil Mellor |
Message #75899, posted by monkeyson2 at 15:47, 31/5/2006, in reply to message #75897 |
Please don't let them make me be a monkey butler
Posts: 12380
|
Ctrl++ works well. Do any browsers remember font settings on a per-site basis? |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Andrew Poole |
Message #75900, posted by andypoole at 16:04, 31/5/2006, in reply to message #75899 |
Posts: 5558
|
Ctrl++ works well. Do any browsers remember font settings on a per-site basis?
Not unless you fancy writing an extension to do so... |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Richard Goodwin |
Message #75909, posted by rich at 18:35, 31/5/2006, in reply to message #75900 |
Dictator for life
Posts: 6828
|
Ctrl++ works well. Do any browsers remember font settings on a per-site basis?
Not unless you fancy writing an extension to do so...
Couldn't you just use Greasemonkey on Firefox?
________
Cheers,
Rich.
|
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Phil Mellor |
Message #75921, posted by monkeyson2 at 19:31, 31/5/2006, in reply to message #75909 |
Please don't let them make me be a monkey butler
Posts: 12380
|
Ctrl++ works well. Do any browsers remember font settings on a per-site basis?
Not unless you fancy writing an extension to do so...
Couldn't you just use Greasemonkey on Firefox?
Not with Safari! |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Richard Goodwin |
Message #75923, posted by rich at 20:57, 31/5/2006, in reply to message #75921 |
Dictator for life
Posts: 6828
|
Ctrl++ works well. Do any browsers remember font settings on a per-site basis?
Not unless you fancy writing an extension to do so...
Couldn't you just use Greasemonkey on Firefox?
Not with Safari!
Couldn't you just use Greasemonkey on Firefox?
________
Cheers,
Rich.
|
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Andrew Poole |
Message #75927, posted by andypoole at 21:12, 31/5/2006, in reply to message #75923 |
Posts: 5558
|
Ctrl++ works well. Do any browsers remember font settings on a per-site basis?
Not unless you fancy writing an extension to do so...
Couldn't you just use Greasemonkey on Firefox?
Not with Safari!
Couldn't you just use Greasemonkey on Firefox?
No, because we're using Safari |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Richard Goodwin |
Message #75931, posted by rich at 22:36, 31/5/2006, in reply to message #75927 |
Dictator for life
Posts: 6828
|
Ctrl++ works well. Do any browsers remember font settings on a per-site basis?
Not unless you fancy writing an extension to do so...
Couldn't you just use Greasemonkey on Firefox?
Not with Safari!
Couldn't you just use Greasemonkey on Firefox?
No, because we're using Safari
Couldn't you just use Greasemonkey on Firefox?
________
Cheers,
Rich.
|
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
John Hoare |
Message #75984, posted by moss at 22:28, 1/6/2006, in reply to message #75931 |
Posts: 9348
|
Interestingly, I was going to *automatically* download Firefox for my new Mac. But Safari is so nice to use, I'll probably stick with it for everyday use, and only use Firefox for testing. |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Andrew Poole |
Message #75995, posted by andypoole at 09:09, 2/6/2006, in reply to message #75984 |
Posts: 5558
|
Interestingly, I was going to *automatically* download Firefox for my new Mac. But Safari is so nice to use, I'll probably stick with it for everyday use, and only use Firefox for testing. Yeah, same here. I have Camino on standby for testing as well (and for using things like live.local.com (which seems to be the only one with aerial photos of here  ) |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
richard cheng |
Message #76000, posted by richcheng at 10:15, 2/6/2006, in reply to message #75995 |
Posts: 655
|
Interestingly, I was going to *automatically* download Firefox for my new Mac. But Safari is so nice to use, I'll probably stick with it for everyday use, and only use Firefox for testing. Yeah, same here. I have Camino on standby for testing as well (and for using things like live.local.com (which seems to be the only one with aerial photos of here )
I like Safari, but it hangs a lot |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Phil Mellor |
Message #76001, posted by monkeyson2 at 10:29, 2/6/2006, in reply to message #76000 |
Please don't let them make me be a monkey butler
Posts: 12380
|
I like Safari, but it hangs a lot This is true. I was wondering if it was because I'm very short on disk space, or have about 10 windows each with about 20 tabs on them. (I don't bookmark stuff, I just leave it open  )
The javascript calendar on Expedia is incredibly slow for some reason. |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
