|
Blank |
|
(15:00 29/4/2002) [mentat] (13:58 15/6/2002) monkeyson (15:25 29/4/2002) monkeyson (12:46 30/4/2002) xyzzy (12:56 30/4/2002) monkeyson (13:00 30/4/2002) Phlamethrower (13:58 15/6/2002) monkeyson (13:58 15/6/2002) Phlamethrower (13:58 15/6/2002) monkeyson (13:58 15/6/2002) monkeyson (21:53 30/4/2002) [mentat] (08:04 1/5/2002)
|
|
monkeyson |
Message #10526, posted at 15:00, 29/4/2002 |
Unregistered user
|
"I must be a great writer because I have writer's blank" 33 words in one hour. Fantastic. |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
monkeyson |
Message #10528, posted at 15:25, 29/4/2002, in reply to message #10527 |
Unregistered user
|
'Blank' is the state of evaluation.tex, the file I should be writing. |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
monkeyson |
Message #10529, posted at 12:46, 30/4/2002, in reply to message #10528 |
Unregistered user
|
I went to bed at 5:30am, and got up again at 7:45. Oh joy. And even now I'm still NOT WORKING |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
xyzzy |
Message #10530, posted at 12:56, 30/4/2002, in reply to message #10529 |
Unregistered user
|
Stop posting to the playpen then you might be able to get some work done :-) |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
monkeyson |
Message #10531, posted at 13:00, 30/4/2002, in reply to message #10530 |
Unregistered user
|
Maybe I can do both!Reversible migration is certainly possible in a migration on request tool. For the Draw format in this project it was achieved (bar some minor information such as user interface preferences). It would even be possible to reversibly migrate WMF files, if its features were integrated in to the intermediate format. Given the conclusion that such features would only serve to clutter the migration tool and should be omitted, it does mean that a choice between complexity and reversibility must be made. blah blah... |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
monkeyson |
Message #10536, posted at 21:53, 30/4/2002, in reply to message #10535 |
Unregistered user
|
And now it's done. HUZZAH AND THINGS. Well, maybe a bit of proof reading. And I've got to comment 5000 lines of source code before 5pm Wednesday. Oh joy.
But after that.... BEER
|
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
I don't have tourettes you're just a cun |
Message #10537, posted by [mentat] at 08:04, 1/5/2002, in reply to message #10536 |
Fear is the mind-killer
Posts: 6266
|
Dang, where's that beer smiley? |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
I don't have tourettes you're just a cun |
Message #10527, posted by [mentat] at 13:58, 15/6/2002, in reply to message #10526 |
Fear is the mind-killer
Posts: 6266
|
"I must be a great writer because I have writer's blank"33 words in one hour. Fantastic. Nice typing speed What's the difference between writer's blank and writer's block? |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
Phlamethrower |
Message #10532, posted at 13:58, 15/6/2002, in reply to message #10531 |
Unregistered user
|
Migration? This is IT, not geography! The proper word to use is 'conversion'. E.g.: Reversible conversion is certainly possible in a conversion on request tool. For the Draw format in this project it was achieved (bar some minor information such as user interface preferences). It would even be possible to reversibly convert WMF files, if its features were integrated in to the intermediate format. Given the conclusion that such features would only serve to clutter the conversion tool and should be omitted, it does mean that a choice between complexity and reversibility must be made. And I don't think 'reversibly' is a real word - use reverse instead. Bah! F- |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
monkeyson |
Message #10533, posted at 13:58, 15/6/2002, in reply to message #10532 |
Unregistered user
|
Migration? This is IT, not geography!The proper word to use is 'conversion'. E.g.: Reversible conversion is certainly possible in a conversion on request tool. For the Draw format in this project it was achieved (bar some minor information such as user interface preferences). It would even be possible to reversibly convert WMF files, if its features were integrated in to the intermediate format. Given the conclusion that such features would only serve to clutter the conversion tool and should be omitted, it does mean that a choice between complexity and reversibility must be made. And I don't think 'reversibly' is a real word - use reverse instead. Bah! F- Migration is the correct word to use when referring to Migration on Request
But I agree `reversibly' is horrid. |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
Phlamethrower |
Message #10534, posted at 13:58, 15/6/2002, in reply to message #10533 |
Unregistered user
|
Migration is the correct word to use when referring to Migration on Request OK, I'll let you off this once |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
monkeyson |
Message #10535, posted at 13:58, 15/6/2002, in reply to message #10534 |
Unregistered user
|
Hurray! I think I have finished the bllcks-writing section of my write up now! Only references, proof reading, and a lack of confidence in what i've written left to go now! No wait, it isn't. I've got the personal reflections, project management, and abstract still to write. Double bllcks. |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
|