| |
Browser Stats |
| |
pnaulls (03:36 31/12/2006)
andrew (16:41 31/12/2006)
rich (12:44 24/1/2007)
ksattic (16:42 24/1/2007)
SimonC (17:06 24/1/2007)
pnaulls (18:40 24/1/2007)
Phlamethrower (18:49 24/1/2007)
|
| |
|
Peter Naulls |
Message #96412, posted by pnaulls at 03:36, 31/12/2006 |
Member
Posts: 317
|
How about a breakdown of Firefox stats by operating system?
Ta. |
| |
 [ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Andrew |
Message #96430, posted by andrew at 16:41, 31/12/2006, in reply to message #96412 |
 Handbag Boi
Posts: 3439
|
I think it's more informative than the A9 poll. |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Richard Goodwin |
Message #97600, posted by rich at 12:44, 24/1/2007, in reply to message #96412 |
 Dictator for life
Posts: 6828
|
How about a breakdown of Firefox stats by operating system?
Ta. After trying to find any RISC OS Firefox accesses, I assume the user agent I'm looking for is something along the lines of:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; riscos arm-acorn; en-US; rv:1.8b4) Gecko/20050728 Firefox/1.0+
...which was a little tricky to arrive at (as riscos and firefox turn up in things like URLs) but seems accurate.
Looking for "riscos arm-acorn" and " Firefox/", and excluding image fetches to just give us page views, the front page of the site was accessed twice last week, and not at all this week so far.
Using the same technique looking for "Macintosh" (to exclude "Mac"-related URLs) produces a few more hits, but most are for RSS feeds. The number of unique IPs accessing non-RSS data seem to be limited to single digits.
So I don't think I'll be adding to the pie charts on the front page 
________
 Cheers,
Rich.
|
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Simon Wilson |
Message #97601, posted by ksattic at 16:42, 24/1/2007, in reply to message #97600 |
 Finally, an avatar!
Posts: 1291
|
Firefox on RISC OS seems fairly useless for anything other than pages that NetSurf cannot render - so perhaps that's why there are very few accesses to TIB. It renders fine with NetSurf.  |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Simon Challands |
Message #97603, posted by SimonC at 17:06, 24/1/2007, in reply to message #97601 |
 Right on, Commander!
Posts: 398
|
I wouldn't say "useless", just "slower", although that amounts to the same practical effect (people using RISC OS will use Netsurf over Firefox wherever possible). IIRC that was always expected. |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Peter Naulls |
Message #97605, posted by pnaulls at 18:40, 24/1/2007, in reply to message #97600 |
Member
Posts: 317
|
After trying to find any RISC OS Firefox accesses, I assume the user agent I'm looking for is something along the lines of:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; riscos arm-acorn; en-US; rv:1.8b4) Gecko/20050728 Firefox/1.0+
...which was a little tricky to arrive at (as riscos and firefox turn up in things like URLs) but seems accurate.
It was changed in later versions. Try this:
Mozilla/5.0 (ChoX11; U; RISC OS 5.11; en-US; rv:1.8b5) Gecko/20051010 Firefox/1.4.1
So I don't think I'll be adding to the pie charts on the front page
You know you want to. |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Jeffrey Lee |
Message #97606, posted by Phlamethrower at 18:49, 24/1/2007, in reply to message #97605 |
 Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot stuff
Posts: 15100
|
Mozilla/5.0 (ChoX11; U; RISC OS 5.11; en-US; rv:1.8b5) Gecko/20051010 Firefox/1.4.1 Assuming you're running RISC OS 5.11, of course |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
